![]() |
Preliminary Report Special Meeting of the Board 13 October 2003 (Posted 20 October 2003) |
|
| ICANN's Board of Directors held a meeting by teleconference on 13 October 2003. Directors Vint Cerf (Chair), Ivan Moura Campos, Lyman Chapin, Mouhamet Diop, Tricia Drakes, Masanobu Katoh, Veni Markovski, Thomas Niles, Michael D. Palage, Alejandro Pisanty, Hualin Qian and Paul Twomey were present. Board Liaisons Steve Crocker (joining late), Roberto Gaetano, John Klensin, Francisco A. Jesus Silva and Mohamed Sharil Tarmizi also participated. Daniel Halloran, ICANN’s Acting Secretary, John Jeffrey, ICANN’s General Counsel designee, Kurt Pritz, ICANN’s Vice President, Business Operations designee, and Esme Smith with Jones Day, counsel to ICANN and acting as secretary for the meeting, were also in attendance. The Board adopted the resolutions provided below and engaged in discussion of the following matters: Adoption of Corrective Amendments to Bylaws
The following resolution was presented for consideration by Mr. Pisanty, and seconded by Mr. Palage:
(The Board approved the above resolution by a 12-0-0 vote.)
The following resolution was presented for consideration by Mr. Twomey, and seconded by Mr. Pisanty:
(The Board approved the above resolution by a 12-0-0 vote.) The following resolutions were presented for consideration by Mr. Campos, and seconded by Mr. Katoh:
(The Board approved the above resolutions by a 12-0-0 vote.) Appointment of Nominating Committee Chair
The following resolutions were presented for consideration by Mr. Pisanty, and seconded by Mr. Markovski:
(The Board approved the above resolutions by a 12-0-0 vote.) Mr. Twomey reviewed for the Board comments of broad interest received on the draft RFP, and considerations raised by the community and Board members on the creation of new sTLDs and new TLDs generally. Significant issues raised included whether to limit a new round for creation of new sTLDs to prior applicants, or allow a wider participant group in the application process, and what timeline for the consideration of new sTLDs, and eventually new generic TLDs was feasible and responsible in light of work to be done. A suggestion was that gTLD specific issues be set aside until these issues could be reviewed and examined in detail, expert analysis could be undertaken and community input received. Further, it was noted that the nature of TLD relationships with ICANN was a structure under much debate at present, and deserved a better understanding of the goals of the parties prior to expanding the number of these relationships. Board members remarked on the significant staffing constraints for ICANN at present, and the foreseen lack of an ability for ICANN to both oversee a round of new sTLD applications, and also invest significant resources and time in gathering and analyzing data on gTLD issues. The Board noted the lengthy list of tasks set forth in ICANN’s new MoU with the Department of Commerce entered into on 17 September specifically called for the development of a strategy and process for the creation of new TLDs by September 2004. In particular, the board debated the wisdom in moving ahead with the creation of new TLDs at this time, in light of the need to shortly commence a full scale review of policy in this area. A brief debate ensued among Board members as to the appropriate set of issues that should be included in a review and development of policy relating to the creation of new TLDs. Board members voiced concerns that many of the TLDs created during the 2000 round were still struggling with myriad acceptance and distribution issues, and that these issues should be carefully examined and addressed to the extent possible prior to considering the creation of new TLDs on a large-scale basis. Discussion ensued among the Board members; in particular, board members focused on the short time frame set forth in the new MoU for the development of strategy and policy in this area, and concerns that any action on sTLDs at present would detract from that effort, and possibly result in an discordant result. In summarizing the views expressed on the topic, Mr. Cerf noted the discussion among the Board did not seem supportive of moving forward with a limited round of new sTLDs at this time. The Board did express a cohesive interest in moving forward with development of strategy and policy on TLDs generally, encompassing both sTLDs and gTLDs, on as expedited a process as feasible. Board members noted an appreciation of the importance to the community of this topic, and the intent to make a statement to the community on the Board’s views on the topic as soon possible. Mr. Twomey reviewed for the Board the tentative agenda set for committee and group meetings in Carthage. A brief review of scheduling concerns followed. Mr. Twomey noted an outreach workshop for the African region was planned, as well as the second stage of the Whois workshop commenced at ICANN’s June 2003 Montreal meeting. A brief review of the proposed migration of Serbia and Montenegro from
the .yu ccTLD to the .cs code was undertaken. As history, it was noted
that this was a proposed action by the IANA in response to the decision
of the ISO-3166 Maintenance Agency to delete the YU alpha-2 code from
the ISO-3166-1 table and replace it with CS. It was noted that the ISO-3166-1
table is understood to be the authoritative list of countries and territories
(and the associated alpha-2 codes) that the IANA relies on generally to
define the ccTLD namespace. The keeper of that list is the ISO-3166 Maintenance
Agency ("ISO-3166/MA"), part of the International Organization
for Standardization. For country names, the ISO-3166/MA takes its cues
from two lists maintained by the United Nations. Mr. Twomey next briefed the Board on discussions with VeriSign registry on a variety of business issues, and recent meetings orchestrated by SECSAC to discuss the changes by VeriSign in the look-up process for the .com and .net TLDs as a function of VeriSign’s SiteFinder service. Mr. Twomey briefly updated the Board on the recent WSIS and CENTR meetings. Proposed efforts to seek to provide additional input into these forums, and coordinate an educational process regarding ICANN were discussed. Mr. Twomey noted the recent formation of the WIPO-2 committee, with committee action scheduled to commence at ICANN’s upcoming Carthage meeting, including presentation of a work plan, and a final report planned for ICANN’s meeting in Rome, scheduled for March 2004. The call was formally adjourned at 8:00 a.m., Pacific time. should be sent to webmaster@icann.org. Page Updated
20-Oct-2003
|
||